Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.5: 30-second clips, inputs and price

Wan 3.0 and Seedance 2.5 both make clips of up to 30 s with audio, frames and references. Wan starts at 2 s and bills per second, Seedance per token.

5 min readSume
All posts

Wan 3.0 and Seedance 2.5 are the two models on Sume's POST /v1/videos that make a single clip of up to 30 seconds, and both take a prompt, a first and last frame, image, video and audio references, and optional audio. What separates them is the meter and the reference caps: Wan bills a flat rate per second at each resolution, Seedance bills per 1,000 video tokens, so frame size and aspect ratio move its price; Wan caps each reference type, while Seedance lists no per-type caps. Wan also starts at 2 seconds against Seedance's 4, and Seedance adds a 21:9 frame.

The limits are those of wan-3.0 and seedance-2.5, from Video generation, Video Router, the Sume API reference, and the catalog and pricing code, read on 2026-09-28. Nothing here ranks their output.

How do Wan 3.0 and Seedance 2.5 differ?

Resolutions, inputs, audio and the 30-second ceiling match, so only the differing rows are listed; Wan 3.0 API and Seedance 2.5 API carry the rest.

Rows that differ, from Video generation, the Sume API reference, and the catalog entries for wan-3.0 and seedance-2.5, read 2026-09-28.
ItemWan 3.0 (`wan-3.0`)Seedance 2.5 (`seedance-2.5`)
Shortest clip2 s4 s
21:9 frameNoYes
Per-type reference caps10 images, 5 videos, 5 audioNone listed
Price basisPer second: $0.0625 at 480p, $0.125 at 720p, $0.25 at 1080pPer 1,000 video tokens: $0.02675, or $0.02925 at 1080p

What does a 30-second clip cost on each?

Wan's price depends only on resolution and length. Seedance counts video tokens, width × height × seconds × 24 fps ÷ 1,024, so size and aspect ratio both move it; audio changes neither in current code. Always send resolution to wan-3.0: without it, Sume reserves at the 1080p rate.

The amounts below are reserved on submit, plus a 5.5% agent fee by default.

Computed from the pricing code behind API pricing, at provider list × 1.25 per Video generation, read 2026-09-28. Seedance at 16:9.
ResolutionWan 3.0, 10 s / 30 sSeedance 2.5, 10 s / 30 s
480p$0.63 / $1.88$2.69 / $8.07
720p$1.25 / $3.75$5.78 / $17.34
1080p$2.50 / $7.50$14.22 / $42.65

How many references can each one take?

Wan 3.0 lists per-type caps, and current code refuses a request with more references of a type than its count cap:

  • Wan 3.0: up to 10 images, up to 5 videos (15 seconds in total, each at 16 fps or more), and up to 5 audio clips (15 seconds in total).
  • Seedance 2.5: image, video and audio references, within the /v1/videos limit of 12 input_references per request; its catalog entry lists no per-type caps.
  • Both: a request that carries frames and references is treated as image-to-video, and the references are dropped.

Is Wan 2.7 or Seedance 2.0 on Sume too?

Seedance 2.0 is, as seedance-2, with the same inputs as 2.5 but a 15-second cap. Wan 2.7 is not: wan-3.0 is the only Wan id in the catalog.

Which should I pick?

  • Pick Wan 3.0 for clips shorter than 4 seconds, or a price that ignores frame shape.
  • Pick Seedance 2.5 for a 21:9 frame.
  • Either one for 16 to 30 seconds in one clip; beyond 30 seconds, chain clips.
  • Price the exact request you plan to send: for Seedance, resolution and aspect ratio both change the token count.

Sources

Related posts

More in Models

All Models posts

Written by Sume