Wan 3.0 vs Gemini Omni Flash: same $0.125/s at 720p, pick by limits
At 720p Wan 3.0 and Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 both cost $0.125 per second on Sume. Their limits differ: 2-30 s vs 3-10 s, ratios, 4K, audio inputs.

At 720p, Wan 3.0 and Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 both cost $0.125 per second on Sume, so price will not choose for you. Wan runs 2 to 30 seconds and takes audio references. Omni runs 3 to 10 seconds, reaches 4K, edits existing clips, and has native synced audio that you cannot turn off. At 1080p Omni is cheaper.
Price per second
Both rows are list x 1.25. Wan 3.0 lists $0.05, $0.10 and $0.20 per second at 480p, 720p and 1080p (fal, 2026-08-24, as recorded in the repo). Omni lists $0.03, $0.10, $0.15 and $0.30 at 360p, 720p, 1080p and 4K (fal, 2026-08-28).
| Resolution | Wan 3.0 | Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 360p | n/a | $0.0375 |
| 480p | $0.0625 | n/a |
| 720p | $0.125 | $0.125 |
| 1080p | $0.25 | $0.1875 |
| 4K | n/a | $0.375 |
Limits side by side
The Video Router docs and model cards give the envelopes.
| Limit | Wan 3.0 | Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Duration | 2-30 s | 3-10 s |
| Aspect ratios | Multiple, incl. 1:1 and 4:3 | 16:9 or 9:16 only |
| Modes | Text, image + end frame, reference | Text, image + end frame, reference, edit |
| Reference images | Up to 10 | Up to 10 |
| Reference videos | Up to 5 | Up to 3, each at most 3 s |
| Audio references | Up to 5 | None |
| Sound | Optional | Always on |
Choosing
Use Wan 3.0 for anything over 10 seconds, for clips under 3 seconds, for square or 4:3 frames, and when you want to feed it a voiceover or track as a reference. A 30 s clip at 720p is $3.75.
Use Omni for 1080p work (a 10 s clip is $1.88 against Wan's $2.50), for 4K, for editing a finished clip with video_url, and for the default Auto route. Both take image references; Omni needs <IMAGE_REF_0> style tags in the prompt to address them.
Same prompt, two models
Because the request shapes line up on /v1/videos, you can A/B the same prompt by changing only model. Keep the duration inside the overlap (3 to 10 s) and the ratio at 16:9 or 9:16. Because both rows are the same price at 720p, the cost of the test is the clip length times $0.125, and the comparison is about picture and sound only. See the reference limits before you attach inputs.
for m in wan-3.0 gemini-omni-flash-1.1; do
curl -s -X POST https://api.sume.com/v1/videos \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $SUME_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "{\"model\":\"$m\",\"prompt\":\"A street musician plays violin at dusk\",\"duration\":6,\"resolution\":\"720p\",\"aspect_ratio\":\"16:9\"}"
echo
doneA budget view
For 20 clips of 8 s at 720p, both models cost $20.00. At 1080p, Omni is $30.00 and Wan is $40.00. At the Wan-only 30 s length a single 1080p clip is $7.50, and a Wan 480p draft of the same length is $1.88. Use those figures to decide whether a long-shot plan or a short-shot plan is cheaper for your story.
The Videos page lists Wan 3.0 as a picker option and reaches Omni through Auto, so you can compare both without leaving the page.
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.5: 24 days apart, both 30 s. What differs
Seedance 2.5 launched July 31, Wan 3.0 about August 24 2026. Both claim 30 seconds. Vendor reference limits compared, and the two Sume ids.
- When to pick Wan 3.0: five questions vs Seedance 2.5 and Omni 1.1
Pick Wan 3.0 on Sume for single clips of 11 to 30 seconds, a 2 second minimum or flat per-second prices. Pick Omni to edit footage or render 4K.
- Where MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming runs today, and a file-based option
Microsoft lists Foundry, MAI Playground and Vercel for MAI-Transcribe-2-Streaming. Its $0.54/h intro rate beside Sume STT at $0.60/h, and when a file job fits.
- Where to use Wan 3.0: wan.video, QwenCloud, or the wan-3.0 API on Sume
Which door to Wan 3.0 fits: Alibaba's channels named in its README, or the wan-3.0 id on Sume with an API key, MCP and Timeline for multi-shot work.
Written by Sume