Does Wan 3.0 do 4K? Claim check against vendor pages and Sume
Alibaba lists 480p, 720p and 1080p for Wan 3.0, Morphic says no 4K, and Sume rejects 4k for wan-3.0. Where 4K exists on Sume and at what clip length.

No. Wan 3.0 outputs 480p, 720p and 1080p, and nothing in the sources checked says otherwise. Alibaba's launch post lists those three tiers with a price for each. Morphic's model page says outright that there is no 4K output and that "Wan 3.0 does 4K" claims in search results do not come from Alibaba. Sume's validation agrees: on the Video Router, a request for 4k is rejected unless the model is minimax-h3 or gemini-omni-flash-1.1.
| Source | What it says about Wan 3.0 resolution |
|---|---|
| Alibaba Cloud launch post | 480P $0.05/s, 720P $0.10/s, 1080P $0.20/s |
| Morphic model page | 480p to 1080p, three tiers, no 4K output |
| Sume catalog entry | 480p, 720p, 1080p; 2 to 30 s |
| Sume Video Router validation | "4k is not supported by Video Router v1" for models other than minimax-h3 and gemini-omni-flash-1.1 |
Why the claim circulates
Morphic also calls out invented spec tables, such as a parameter count and an open-weights licence, and says no weights have appeared for Wan 3.0 and that Alibaba's open line stops at Wan 2.2. If a page lists a 4K tier for Wan 3.0 without a vendor link, treat the page as unreliable for the other numbers too.
If you need more than 1080p on Sume
Sume's video docs say gemini-omni-flash-1.1 accepts 3 to 10 seconds at 360p, 720p, 1080p and 4K in 16:9 or 9:16. The same docs say minimax-h3 bills 2K and 4K upscales when a request includes them. Neither is a 30-second model, so a 4K film at that length means stitching clips from a short-clip model.
For a 30-second master at the highest tier Wan 3.0 offers, 1080p is $7.50 on Sume (30 x $0.20 x 1.25). Seedance 2.5 also stops at 1080p.
The cost of testing the claim yourself
You do not need to pay to learn this. GET /v1/videos/models returns supported_resolutions for each model, so the first check is a catalog call rather than a render. If you submit a 4k request to wan-3.0 on the Video Router anyway, request validation refuses it. The cheapest real test of the resolution tiers is the same 2-second prompt at each: 2 x $0.0625 = $0.125 at 480p (billed as $0.13), $0.25 at 720p and $0.50 at 1080p.
Seedance 2.5 sits in the same position. Its catalog entry lists 480p, 720p and 1080p and the 4-to-30-second range, and the pricing table assigns a higher per-token rate to the 1080p tier than to the two lower tiers, so there is no hidden fourth tier to price.
What to do with a 4K deliverable
- Check whether the buyer needs 4K pixels or a 4K container. A 1080p render in a 4K timeline is a different file from a native 4K render.
- Draft at 480p ($1.88 for 30 s) and finish at 1080p ($7.50) before deciding that 4K matters.
- Read supported_resolutions from GET /v1/videos/models for the model you pick instead of copying a number from a blog post, this one included.
Sources
Related posts
More in Models
- Wan 3.0 document-to-video claim vs what Sume accepts as reference
Alibaba says Wan 3.0 reads PDFs, slides and docs. Sume's catalog lists image, video and audio references for it, not documents. Read the field before you plan.
- Wan 3.0 same-face test: eight 480p takes for $3.04 before 1080p
Alibaba says Wan 3.0 avoids same-face AI people. Test that claim on Sume with eight 6-second 480p takes at $0.38 each, then render only the best at 1080p.
- Which Sume image models are text-to-image only, with no photo edits
Five Sume image models reject reference images: Higgsfield Soul, Imagen 4 Fast, Imagen 4 Ultra, Recraft V4 and Qwen Image Max. Prices, ratios and edit options.
- An OpenRouter-compatible video API: sume/auto or a pinned model
Sume's POST /v1/videos follows OpenRouter's video generation API field for field. Let sume/auto pick the model, or pin a catalog id like seedance-2.5.
Written by Sume