Veo 3.1 price per second vs Sume's Video Router models
Google lists Veo 3.1 at $0.05 to $0.60 per second. Sume does not offer Veo 3.1 in its v1 catalog; here is the 8-second, 100-clip math for what it does.

Google's Gemini API page lists Veo 3.1 at $0.05 to $0.60 per second depending on resolution (read 2026-10-07), so an 8-second clip is $0.40 to $4.80 and 100 clips are $40 to $480. Sume does not offer Veo 3.1: its docs list Veo 3.1 as not in the v1 catalog. If you need Veo, buy it from Google.
Veo 3.1 at Google's list
The multiplication is simple. $0.05 x 8 s = $0.40 per clip, and $0.60 x 8 s = $4.80. For 100 clips that is $40.00 and $480.00. I did not read which resolution maps to which price on the page summary, so treat the two ends as a range.
Runway's API page also lists Veo 3.1 at 10 to 40 credits per second at $0.01 per credit (read 2026-10-07), or $0.10 to $0.40 per second, so a reseller price differs from Google's own range.
What Sume offers in the same clip size
These are Video Router rows from the Sume docs, priced at provider list x 1.25 for an 8-second clip. They are different models with different looks, so the table is a cost reference, not a quality ranking.
| Option | Per second | 8 s clip | 100 clips |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google Veo 3.1, low end | $0.05 | $0.40 | $40.00 |
| Google Veo 3.1, high end | $0.60 | $4.80 | $480.00 |
| Sume Wan 3.0, 480p | $0.0625 | $0.50 | $50.00 |
| Sume Wan 3.0, 720p | $0.125 | $1.00 | $100.00 |
| Sume H3 Max, 768p | $0.10 | $0.80 | $80.00 |
| Sume Gemini Omni Flash 1.1, 720p | $0.125 | $1.00 | $100.00 |
| Sume Gemini Omni Flash 1.1, 4K | $0.375 | $3.00 | $300.00 |
The honest read
Sume costs more than the list price for the same underlying model, because of the 25 percent margin. Where you want one API for several video models, a job queue and a single balance, that is the trade. Where you specifically want Veo, go direct; there is no Sume workaround to claim here.
Sume's own docs also say the Video Router catalog changes. Call GET /v1/video-router/models for the current set before you plan a launch around a model name.
A decision rule
If the model is fixed by creative requirements (you need Veo 3.1 specifically), the price question is moot, because Sume cannot sell it to you. If the requirement is looser (a photoreal 8-second clip with native audio), then the question becomes the cost per usable clip, not per second.
A simple test: generate 10 clips on each candidate, count how many you would publish, and divide the batch cost by that count. A $0.50 clip with a 40 percent keep rate costs $1.25 per kept clip; a $1.00 clip with an 80 percent keep rate costs $1.25 as well. Per-second prices tell you nothing until you know the keep rate, so measure it on your own prompts before you scale to 100.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- AI voiceover cost for 100 scripts: Sume vs ElevenLabs v4
100 scripts of 800 characters cost $3.80 on Sume TTS, $6.40 on ElevenLabs v4 at list, or $1.76 under its discount that ends Oct 12.
- Wan 2.7 vs Wan 3.0: clip length and resolution limits by model id
Wan 2.7 tops out at 15 s and starts at 720P; Wan 3.0 reaches 30 s and adds 480P. Alibaba's ids side by side, and which one Sume lists.
- 20-second highlight reel: Seedance 2.5 at $5.38 vs Wan 3.0 at $2.50
A 20-second highlight clip costs $5.38 on seedance-2.5 at 480p and $2.50 on wan-3.0 at 720p on Sume. Use video references to keep the look.
- Can I use Suno Speech beta for an ad voiceover? What to check first
Suno Speech beta makes one track with voice and music. Before using it for ads, check price, languages and edits, then see how Sume splits voice and music.
Written by Sume