Runway gen4.5 API: 12 credits a second, a 10 s clip costs $1.20
Runway's API page prices gen4.5 at 12 credits a second at $0.01 a credit. A 10 second clip is $1.20; compared with Sume ids on the catalog.

A 10 second Runway gen4.5 clip costs 120 credits, which is $1.20, because Runway's API pricing guide lists gen4.5 at 12 credits per second and sells credits at $0.01 each. gen4.5 is not a model id you can call on Sume; the nearest 10 second clips on the Sume catalog cost between $1.00 and $1.25 at 720p-class settings.
Runway's same page lists gen4_turbo at 5 credits per second ($0.05), veo3.1 with audio at 40 ($0.40), veo3.1_fast at 15 ($0.15), aleph2 at 28 ($0.28), seedance2 at 1080p at 40 ($0.40), wan3 at 1080p at 20 ($0.20) and act_two at 5 ($0.05). It states its USD column is based on $0.01 per credit.
10 seconds across Runway and Sume
Sume figures are the provider list times 1.25, taken from Sume's pricing estimator for the stated resolution. None of the Runway models in the first block exist as Sume ids.
| Option | Per second | 10 second clip |
|---|---|---|
| Runway gen4.5 | $0.12 | $1.20 |
| Runway gen4_turbo | $0.05 | $0.50 |
| Sume minimax-h3-max, 768p | $0.10 | $1.00 |
| Sume wan-3.0, 720p | $0.125 | $1.25 |
| Sume gemini-omni-flash-1.1, 720p | $0.125 | $1.25 |
Reading the comparison
gen4_turbo at $0.50 for 10 seconds is the cheapest line on this table, and Sume has nothing priced below $1.00 at 10 seconds in the 720p class. If your brief is a quick motion test, that is a real point for Runway; Sume's cheaper entries are 480p drafts, for example wan-3.0 at 480p, 10 x $0.0625 = $0.625.
Where the comparison is not like for like: Runway's page does not state resolution or audio for gen4.5 in the part of the page read, while the Sume rows are fixed at the stated resolution, and gemini-omni-flash-1.1 always includes native synced audio per the Video Router docs. Check the clip you actually need before reading anything into a dollar gap.
Budgeting the switch
Runway credits are bought as a block at $0.01 each, while Sume draws on a workspace USD balance and reserves each job on submit. For a 20 clip test at 10 seconds, gen4.5 is 20 x $1.20 = $24.00, and 20 x $1.00 = $20.00 on minimax-h3-max at 768p.
The Sume ids and their limits are listed by GET /v1/video-router/models; video generation covers the same catalog through POST /v1/videos.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- Runway Model Router credit ceiling vs Sume max_spend_usd
Runway's per-modality credit ceiling removes costly models before ranking and errors if none fit. Sume's max_spend_usd caps one call. How the two caps differ.
- Runway Model Router dryRun: preview the pick, and what Sume Auto shows
Runway's Model Router has a dryRun preview, per-modality credit ceilings and cost, latency or quality goals. Sume's sume/auto never says which family ran.
- Runway Model Routers report the model used; Sume Auto does not
Runway says router generations bill at the selected model's rate and report the model and cost. Sume's sume/auto never discloses which family ran.
- Runway Seedance 2.0 4K at 150 credits a second: cost
Runway bills Seedance 2.0 4K at 150 credits a second, $1.50 at its $0.01 credit. What a clip costs against 1080p, and what Sume's seedance-2 offers instead.
Written by Sume