Reference limits per request, vendor vs Sume: Wan 3.0, Seedance, Omni
What each vendor says one video request can take, next to what Sume's catalog allows: Wan 3.0, Seedance 2.5, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash, and Ray3.2.

The vendors' published caps per request are higher than what Sume's catalog allows in some cases, and Sume does not run every model. Alibaba says Wan 3.0 takes up to 20 reference assets; Sume's wan-3.0 entry allows up to 10 images, 5 videos and 5 audio files. ByteDance says Seedance 2.5 takes up to 30 images, 10 video clips and 10 audio clips per pass. Google says Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash takes video references of up to 3 seconds. Luma says Ray3.2 takes up to 16 keyframes, and Sume does not ship Ray3.2. The table below puts the vendor line and the Sume line side by side, so you can plan a request that the platform you actually call will accept.
The table
Vendor numbers come from each vendor's own page, read on 2026-10-05. Sume numbers come from the Video generation docs and the Video Router docs, and from the catalog constraints you can read through GET /v1/video-router/models.
| Model | Vendor says | Sume catalog |
|---|---|---|
| Wan 3.0 | Up to 20 reference assets: documents, webpages, text, images | wan-3.0: images up to 10; videos up to 5 (15 s total, 16 fps or more); audio up to 5 (15 s total); no web_url or file_url |
| Seedance 2.5 | Per pass up to 30 images, 10 video clips, 10 audio clips | seedance-2.5 is in the catalog, 4 to 30 s; read its capabilities from GET /v1/video-router/models for reference counts |
| Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash | Video references up to 3 s; scene extension up to 40 s total | gemini-omni-flash-1.1: up to 10 images and 3 video references of 3 s or less, no audio references |
| Ray3.2 | Up to 16 keyframes per clip, 1080p, up to 20 s | Not in Sume's catalog |
What the gap means
The gap has three causes. Vendors state what the model can do in their own product, and Sume exposes the fields it has wired up and tested. A vendor can accept documents and webpages as reference types, while Sume's request takes URLs for images, video and audio only. And some vendor features are not request fields at all but behaviors, such as Wan 3.0's automatic scene splitting.
- If you need more than 10 images for Wan 3.0 on Sume, split the job into two requests and join the clips with Timeline 1.0.
- If you need document input, prepare the pages as images and send those; do not expect Sume to read a PDF.
- If you need Ray3.2 keyframes, you need Luma's own surface; Sume's catalog does not list the model.
- If a number matters, read it from the catalog at call time, not from a table in a blog post.
How to read the live limits
Two reads cover it. GET /v1/videos/models returns, for each model, supported_resolutions, supported_aspect_ratios, supported_durations, supported_input_references and pricing_skus. GET /v1/video-router/models returns capabilities and notes that each model can have a different envelope. Write your request builder to read these two responses rather than hard-code a limit, because the docs say limits differ for each model and Sume can change a catalog entry.
curl "https://api.sume.com/v1/videos/models" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $SUME_API_KEY"
curl "https://api.sume.com/v1/video-router/models/wan-3.0" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $SUME_API_KEY"A note on availability
Vendor availability differs from Sume availability. ByteDance's Seedance 2.5 page says the API is coming via BytePlus ModelArk, while the model is already in Sume's catalog. Treat each vendor page as a statement about that vendor's product on the date read, and the Sume docs as a statement about Sume. When they disagree, the one you call is the one that decides what your request can contain.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- Replicate's default webhook secret versus Sume's signing secret
Replicate's secret is at /v1/webhooks/default/secret and it signs id.timestamp.body. Sume's is at /v1/webhooks/signing-secret and signs timestamp.raw_body.
- Retouch 200 product photos: Image API, Agent Completion or Format?
For 200 identical retouches use POST /v1/images: fixed model, price per image, plan queue limits. Use an Agent Completion only if each photo needs judgement.
- Rime Mist v3 vs Coda vs Sume TTS: cost for 1M characters
Rime lists Mist v3 at $0.03 and Coda at $0.05 per 1K characters. Sume TTS 1.0 is $0.0475. Here is the cost of 1M characters and a 20,000-character call.
- Runway: no RPM limit but a daily cap; Sume answers 429 two ways
Runway documents no per-minute limit but a rolling 24-hour generation cap. Sume returns 429 queue_full or rate_limited, with ratelimit headers.
Written by Sume