Pick an image model by job: product photo, poster text, edit
Five new image releases in a month. A job-first table for Sume: GPT Image 2.5, Ideogram 4.5, Nano Banana 2.1, FLUX.2 and Qwen, with the limits that decide.

Choose by the job. For a masked or transparent-background edit, use openai/gpt-image-2.5, the only model on Sume that takes mask_url and background. For text inside the image, try ideogram/ideogram-v4.5. For multi-reference product shots, try google/nano-banana-2.1 or black-forest-labs/flux.2-pro. For a hosted Qwen, use qwen/qwen-image-max. If you do not care, send sume/auto.
What shipped in the last five weeks
ChatGPT Images 2.5 and its two API models arrived on 2026-09-08, Qwen-Image 2.1 weights in September, Ideogram 4.5 on 2026-09-30, and Nano Banana 2.1 on 2026-10-06. Sume lists the GPT, Ideogram, Nano Banana, FLUX.2 and Qwen families, but not every vendor release is a Sume id, so the table points at the ids that exist.
| Job | Sume id | What decides it |
|---|---|---|
| Masked edit, transparent output | openai/gpt-image-2.5 or -sunburst | mask_url and background only here; 16 references |
| Poster or label text | ideogram/ideogram-v4.5 | quality low, medium, high at $0.03, $0.06, $0.22 list; 5 references |
| Many references, consistent subject | google/nano-banana-2.1 | Google claims 14 references; Sume caps the model per its catalog |
| Retexture, consistent product shots | black-forest-labs/flux.2-pro | Vendor lists retexturing and product photography for the FLUX.2 line |
| Hosted Qwen | qwen/qwen-image-max | Qwen-Image 2.1 itself is not a Sume id |
| No preference | sume/auto | Family is never disclosed in the response |
The limits that decide it
Reference counts differ: 16 on GPT Image 2.5, up to 10 by default, and 5 on Ideogram 4.5. Quality tiers differ: xhigh and max are GPT Image 2.5 only. Parameters a model does not list return 400 unsupported_parameter, so a wrong pick fails loudly instead of quietly dropping your mask.
Test before you commit
Run the same prompt and reference on two candidates, three samples each, and compare the cost per usable image, using usage.cost from each response. Sume has no seed in v1, so repeated runs are the only honest test.
for m in openai/gpt-image-2.5 ideogram/ideogram-v4.5 google/nano-banana-2.1; do
curl -s -X POST "https://api.sume.com/v1/images" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $SUME_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "{\"model\":\"$m\",\"prompt\":\"studio photo of a matte black water bottle on a white sweep, label reads HYDRA 750 ML\",\"aspect_ratio\":\"1:1\"}" | jq -r '.model, .usage.cost, .data[0].url'
doneWhat this table does not claim
Vendor quality claims are vendor claims. Nothing here ranks the models on image quality, because I ran no benchmark. The prices quoted are list prices from the pages I read; Sume's own price per model comes from its endpoint record.
When to re-run this table
Update your choice when:
- A model is retired and its id starts running as a successor.
- A catalog row adds or drops a parameter you rely on.
- A price line changes in the endpoint record.
Sources
- AI Weekly: OpenAI adds Sketch to ChatGPT Images 2.5, ships two API models (read 2026-10-07)
- Decrypt: Google launches Nano Banana 2.1 (read 2026-10-07)
- fal: Ideogram V4.5 (read 2026-10-07)
- Hugging Face: Qwen/Qwen-Image-2.1 (read 2026-10-07)
- [Black Forest Labs: FLUX.2 [max] (read 2026-10-07)](https://bfl.ai/models/flux-2-max)
- Image API
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- Sora API shutdown report: which claims Sume docs can answer
Pondero's Sora API shutdown report names Runway, Kling and Seedance. Sort its claims from what Sume's docs list, so you do not assume a model is there.
- Precise image editing on Sume: what it has and what it lacks
A plain list of what Sume offers for precise edits after Flux 3 Image and Ideogram 4.5: no Flux 3, no box field, mask_url on one model, Ideogram 4.5 present.
- Real-time or async avatar: six questions to ask before you choose
Need an avatar that talks live, or a finished clip? Six yes/no questions decide it, with what Sume's async avatar jobs cover and what they do not.
- Recraft V4 or FLUX.2 Pro for an illustration set on Sume: price, edits
Recraft V4 bills $0.05 per image on Sume and is text-only; FLUX.2 Pro bills $0.0375 and takes reference images. Ratios, n limits and which fits a set.
Written by Sume