Midjourney V8.1 draft mode makes 24 images; Sume caps n at 10 per call
Midjourney V8.1 draft mode returns 24 lower-res images per job. Sume's n is capped 1-10 per request and lower per model, so 24 images takes 3 to 6 calls.

A Midjourney V8.1 draft-mode job makes 24 lower-resolution images and uses half the fast hours of a standard V8.1 SD job, per Midjourney's June 16, 2026 post. On Sume, one POST /v1/images call returns at most 10 images, and each model's own cap is often lower, so 24 images means 3 calls at a cap of 10 and 6 calls at a cap of 4. Midjourney is not in the Sume image catalog.
The two limits
The Midjourney figures are from its update post (read 2026-10-05) and are dated June 16, 2026. The Sume figures are from the Image API docs.
| Item | Midjourney V8.1 draft mode | Sume POST /v1/images |
|---|---|---|
| Images per job or call | 24 lower-res images | n from 1 to 10, plus a per-model cap |
| Cost signal | Half the fast hours of a standard V8.1 SD job | Pay cost_usd x n, in USD |
| Where to read the cap | Update post | The n range descriptor in GET /v1/images/models |
| Preview flag | --preview for unreleased models | Not documented |
Calls needed for 24 images
Divide 24 by the model's n maximum and round up. The docs' own catalog example shows a model with n max of 4, so check the model you plan to use.
- Cost does not change with the split: the docs say you pay
cost_usd x n, so 24 images cost 24 xcost_usdhowever many calls you make. - Fewer, larger calls may fall back to a 202 job if they pass the 30-second wait, so read the status code.
| Model n cap | Calls | How the images split |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 3 | 10 + 10 + 4 |
| 8 | 3 | 8 + 8 + 8 |
| 4 | 6 | 4 x 6 |
| 1 | 24 | 1 x 24 |
Fan out in code
This sends 24 images as batches of 4, in parallel, and counts the images. Change CAP to the model's real maximum from the catalog. It uses asyncio.gather, so the whole set depends on the slowest call; check each response status as shown.
import asyncio, os, httpx
CAP, TOTAL = 4, 24
async def one(c, headers, n):
body = {"model": "google/nano-banana-2", "prompt": "logo concept, geometric fox", "n": n}
r = await c.post("https://api.sume.com/v1/images", headers=headers, json=body)
return len(r.json()["data"]) if r.status_code == 200 else 0
async def main():
headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {os.environ['SUME_API_KEY']}"}
sizes = [min(CAP, TOTAL - i) for i in range(0, TOTAL, CAP)]
async with httpx.AsyncClient(timeout=90) as c:
got = await asyncio.gather(*(one(c, headers, n) for n in sizes))
print(sum(got), "images in", len(sizes), "calls")
asyncio.run(main())What drafts are for
Draft mode is a way to look at many compositions cheaply and pick one. On Sume the same idea is a cheap model at a low tier for the sweep and a better model for the winner. Check the catalog pricing line for each before you decide. For another view of Midjourney against the API route, see whether Sume offers a Midjourney API.
Cost of a 24-image sweep
Sume's price is per image, so a 24-image sweep costs 24 x the model's cost_usd. As an illustration, a row billed at $0.05 per image would cost 24 x $0.05 = $1.20 for the set. Read the real line from the endpoints call, and set the first sweep at the smallest size and quality the model allows, then regenerate only the winner at full quality.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- Nano Banana 2 Lite alternative on Sume: image rows under 4 cents
Sume lists no Nano Banana 2 Lite row. Seven rows quote under $0.04, from GPT Image 2.5 low at $0.0074 to Flux 2 Pro at $0.0375. Table with edit support.
- Nano Banana 2 vs Ideogram 4.5 for photo edits: ratios, 4K, refs
Nano Banana 2 offers 512 to 4K, 21:9 and 10 references on Sume. Ideogram 4.5 offers 1K and 2K, 15 ratios, 5 references and keeps the source shape on edits.
- Nova 2 Sonic runs in 4 AWS regions; can you pick one on Sume TTS?
Amazon lists Nova 2 Sonic GA in N. Virginia, Oregon, Tokyo and Stockholm. Sume's TTS has one base URL and no region field; here is what that means for you.
- Draft first: Omni 1.1 Flash 360p or Seedance 2.5 at 480p on Sume
Google says Omni 1.1 Flash's 360p draft mode is up to 60% faster at a third of the cost. What that proves, and where Seedance 2.5 480p fits on Sume.
Written by Sume