Luma Ray3.2 features against what Sume's docs list: a one-page matrix

Luma lists 16 keyframes, 20 s, 1080p, HDR with 16-bit EXR, 8-face tracking and Reframe for Ray3.2. Sume does not ship it; here is what Sume's docs cover.

5 min readSume
All posts

Sume does not offer Luma Ray3.2. It is not in the Sume video catalog, so every Ray3.2 row below is a vendor fact and every Sume row is what Sume's docs say. This page is a matrix to help you decide where a Ray3.2 feature has no Sume equivalent. It does not say either side is better.

The matrix

Ray3.2 facts come from Luma's launch page, read 2026-10-05, dated 2026-06-09.

Ray3.2 vendor facts against the pages of Sume's docs that cover the same ground (read 2026-10-05)
Ray3.2 (Luma)Sume docsGap?
Up to 16 keyframes per clipStart and end frame (image_url + end_image_url); H3 Max does first/last-frame image-to-videoTwo frames, not sixteen
1080p1080p on Seedance 2.5 and H3 Max; 4K on Gemini Omni Flash 1.11080p exists on Sume
Up to 20 sSeedance 2.5 takes 4 to 30 s; Wan 3.0 2 to 30 s; most others 15 s maxLengths overlap
Native HDR, 16-bit EXR exportNo Sume docs page mentions HDR or EXR; Timeline outputs MP4Not covered
Facial performance tracking, up to 8 facesNo Sume docs page mentions face trackingNot covered
ReframeCrop through video filter; no reframe opNot equal
Full control surface via APIAsync jobs with status, result, events and webhooksDifferent surface

What Luma's page does not say

Luma's launch page lists features. It is not a price list or a limits sheet, and nothing here states Ray3.2 prices or per-feature costs. If you are deciding between tools on cost, read Luma's current pricing page directly; this matrix does not replace it. The same is true for Sume: the docs say Sume bills the provider list times 1.25 for video, and the catalog's pricing_skus give the figures for each model.

Also check the date. The Ray3.2 launch page is dated 2026-06-09 and vendors change features after launch. A row that is a gap today may close, and a Sume row can change when the catalog does.

Questions to ask before you pick

  • Do you need EXR or HDR delivery, or is an MP4 enough?
  • Do you need to track several faces through one clip?
  • Is a 16-keyframe path essential, or could two key frames do?
  • Do you need clips longer than 15 seconds? If so, check which Sume models list longer limits.
  • Do you plan to caption, trim and assemble the clip afterwards? Those steps are where Sume's docs are strongest.

Reading the table

Resolution and length are not the gap. Seedance 2.5 and Wan 3.0 accept longer clips than 20 seconds on Sume, and 1080p is available on more than one model. The gaps are the post-production features: many keyframes, HDR with an EXR export, tracking of many faces, and reframing. If your pipeline needs one of them, the docs do not offer a Sume substitute.

A keyframe-heavy shot can be approximated by chaining several clips with start and end frames, but each clip is a separate job with its own cost. Do not expect it to match a single 16-keyframe clip.

What to do with this

Decide which Ray3.2 feature you actually use. List it. Check it against the Sume docs rather than a summary page, because Sume's catalog changes: read GET /v1/video-router/models for the live set of ids and limits. If the feature you need is on the not-covered list, use Luma for that step and bring the clip into Sume for captions, trimming or assembly, which work on Sume-hosted files.

Sources

Related posts

More in Comparisons

All Comparisons posts

Written by Sume