Luma Ray3.2 features against what Sume's docs list: a one-page matrix
Luma lists 16 keyframes, 20 s, 1080p, HDR with 16-bit EXR, 8-face tracking and Reframe for Ray3.2. Sume does not ship it; here is what Sume's docs cover.

Sume does not offer Luma Ray3.2. It is not in the Sume video catalog, so every Ray3.2 row below is a vendor fact and every Sume row is what Sume's docs say. This page is a matrix to help you decide where a Ray3.2 feature has no Sume equivalent. It does not say either side is better.
The matrix
Ray3.2 facts come from Luma's launch page, read 2026-10-05, dated 2026-06-09.
| Ray3.2 (Luma) | Sume docs | Gap? |
|---|---|---|
| Up to 16 keyframes per clip | Start and end frame (image_url + end_image_url); H3 Max does first/last-frame image-to-video | Two frames, not sixteen |
| 1080p | 1080p on Seedance 2.5 and H3 Max; 4K on Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 | 1080p exists on Sume |
| Up to 20 s | Seedance 2.5 takes 4 to 30 s; Wan 3.0 2 to 30 s; most others 15 s max | Lengths overlap |
| Native HDR, 16-bit EXR export | No Sume docs page mentions HDR or EXR; Timeline outputs MP4 | Not covered |
| Facial performance tracking, up to 8 faces | No Sume docs page mentions face tracking | Not covered |
| Reframe | Crop through video filter; no reframe op | Not equal |
| Full control surface via API | Async jobs with status, result, events and webhooks | Different surface |
What Luma's page does not say
Luma's launch page lists features. It is not a price list or a limits sheet, and nothing here states Ray3.2 prices or per-feature costs. If you are deciding between tools on cost, read Luma's current pricing page directly; this matrix does not replace it. The same is true for Sume: the docs say Sume bills the provider list times 1.25 for video, and the catalog's pricing_skus give the figures for each model.
Also check the date. The Ray3.2 launch page is dated 2026-06-09 and vendors change features after launch. A row that is a gap today may close, and a Sume row can change when the catalog does.
Questions to ask before you pick
- Do you need EXR or HDR delivery, or is an MP4 enough?
- Do you need to track several faces through one clip?
- Is a 16-keyframe path essential, or could two key frames do?
- Do you need clips longer than 15 seconds? If so, check which Sume models list longer limits.
- Do you plan to caption, trim and assemble the clip afterwards? Those steps are where Sume's docs are strongest.
Reading the table
Resolution and length are not the gap. Seedance 2.5 and Wan 3.0 accept longer clips than 20 seconds on Sume, and 1080p is available on more than one model. The gaps are the post-production features: many keyframes, HDR with an EXR export, tracking of many faces, and reframing. If your pipeline needs one of them, the docs do not offer a Sume substitute.
A keyframe-heavy shot can be approximated by chaining several clips with start and end frames, but each clip is a separate job with its own cost. Do not expect it to match a single 16-keyframe clip.
What to do with this
Decide which Ray3.2 feature you actually use. List it. Check it against the Sume docs rather than a summary page, because Sume's catalog changes: read GET /v1/video-router/models for the live set of ids and limits. If the feature you need is on the not-covered list, use Luma for that step and bring the clip into Sume for captions, trimming or assembly, which work on Sume-hosted files.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- Luma Ray3.2 image-to-video ad: first-frame models on Sume at 5 seconds
Luma Ray3.2 is not on Sume. For a still-to-video ad, a 5-second 720p clip is $0.63 on Omni or Wan, $0.70 on Kling 3 and $0.38 on H3 at 768p.
- Lyria 3.5 music: $0.125 a track on Sume vs $0.08 a song at Google
Google lists Lyria 3.5 at $0.08 a song; Sume's Music Router bills a fixed $0.125 a generation. For 200 holiday ad beds the gap is $10.00. What it covers.
- Lyria 3.5 vs Suno v6 for ad background music
Lyria 3.5 is an API at $0.08 a song with SynthID. Suno v6 is a subscription with commercial rights only on paid plans. Pick by workflow, then check terms.
- MAI-Transcribe-2 vs Sume STT 1.0: keywords, diarization, price
MAI-Transcribe-2: keyword biasing, diarization, $0.10/hr limited-time. Sume STT 1.0: $0.01 per minute ($0.60/hr), word timings always on, no keyword field.
Written by Sume