Happy Horse 1.1 at $0.14 and $0.18 a second: nearby Sume rows

If you saw Happy Horse 1.1 priced at $0.14 a second for 720p and $0.18 for 1080p, the quick answer for Sume is that the Video Router catalog has no Happy Horse id, so you cannot call it there. Wan 3.0, Gemini Omni Flash 1.1, MiniMax H3 Max and Kling 3 are the rows that sit near it on resolution, duration and sound. The Happy Horse figures come from fal's model page, read 2026-10-03; everything about Sume comes from the catalog in the repository and the Video Router docs.

What does the fal page say?

The text-to-video page lists 720p at $0.14 per second and 1080p at $0.18 per second, durations from 3 to 15 seconds, and aspect ratios 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3 and 3:4 as well as 21:9, 9:21, 5:4 and 4:5. It also states that native audio is generated with the video, with multilingual lip-sync. That is the vendor's own list price, before any reseller margin.

Sume's own docs are explicit that this is not a listed family: the repository note on the video wire says Happy Horse 1.1 is not in the v1 catalog and has no provider registry entry. Use the models endpoint to confirm what your workspace sees today.

How do the list prices compare?

To compare fairly, the table puts every figure at provider list, per second, with no Sume margin. Sume adds 1.25 times on top of its own list rows, so a Sume bill is higher than the number shown for those rows.

Which Sume row is the closest substitute?

On duration, H3 Max (5 to 15 seconds), Kling 3 (4 to 15) and Wan 3.0 (2 to 30) cover the 3 to 15 second envelope with room to spare, while Omni stops at 10. On price per second at 1080p, Omni's list rate of $0.15 and H3 Max's $0.16 are both under Happy Horse's $0.18, and Wan 3.0 at $0.20 is above it. On sound, H3 Max, Omni and Kling 3 with audio on all produce it; Wan 3.0's catalog entry lists audio capability as well.

What you pay on Sume is the list rate times 1.25: a 10-second 1080p Omni clip is $1.88, an H3 Max clip $2.00, a Wan clip $2.50.

Can an agent still reach it?

The Video Router is the explicit catalog, and sume/auto lets Sume pick the family without disclosing which one served the request, so you cannot ask Auto for a particular model by name. If a brief needs a specific family, pin a catalog id. If it needs one that is not listed, the honest answer is that Sume does not offer it today.

When you read a competitor's price page, check the unit before the number. The fal page prices per second of output, as the Sume rows do, but a resolution tier on one page need not match a tier on another: Omni's 720p and H3 Max's 768p are different grids from the 720p and 1080p on the fal page, which is why the table keeps the labels as each source gives them.

What should I verify before relying on this?

Vendor prices change, and Sume's catalog dates its own lines: Wan 2026-08-24, Omni 2026-08-28, H3 Max 2026-09-08. Read the fal page and GET /v1/video-router/models again on the day you budget. And note that likeness is a prompt-and-reference question, not a price one: the substitutes above are different models, so run a test clip before you swap one in for a campaign.