GPT Image 2.5 at $8 and $30 per million tokens vs Sume's cost
OpenAI prices GPT Image 2.5 per token. Sume meters images per image, returns usage.cost in USD and always reports 0 tokens. Here is how to budget.

A launch report on AI Weekly (read 2026-10-07) prices both GPT Image 2.5 API models at $8.00 per million image input tokens and $30.00 per million image output tokens. Sume does not bill by token for images. It meters per image, sets usage.cost to the USD amount charged to your wallet, and always returns 0 for the token counts, so budget from the cost field, not from tokens.
The token prices on the page
The launch report gives the same prices for Flare and Sunburst. Sume's docs add the input-text rate from the provider rate card they cite: $5 per million input text tokens. They also say output estimates use OpenAI's ChatGPT Image 2.5 size and quality calculator, and that the provider rounds the total up to $0.0001.
| Line | Rate | Where stated |
|---|---|---|
| Output image tokens | $30 per million | Launch report and Sume docs |
| Input image tokens | $8 per million | Launch report and Sume docs |
| Input text tokens | $5 per million | Sume docs |
| Flare vs Sunburst price | identical | Launch report and Sume docs |
What Sume shows instead
The endpoint record for each model has a pricing array with a cost_usd per billable line, and that amount already includes Sume's pricing. The response then reports usage.cost, the billed USD amount, with prompt_tokens, completion_tokens and total_tokens fixed at 0. The docs state that per-token usage data is not available yet.
How quality changes the reserve
Quality is the main spend lever. The docs list auto, low, medium, high, xhigh and max for GPT Image 2.5, and the default is high if you omit it. Quality auto reserves max, and auto size reserves the upper bound of output tokens. So if you want predictable reserves on a batch, pass explicit quality and an explicit size rather than auto.
curl "https://api.sume.com/v1/images/models/openai/gpt-image-2.5/endpoints" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $SUME_API_KEY"
curl -X POST "https://api.sume.com/v1/images" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $SUME_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"openai/gpt-image-2.5","prompt":"flat-lay of a leather wallet, soft window light","quality":"medium","aspect_ratio":"1:1"}'Practical budgeting
Run five images at the quality you plan to ship, sum the usage.cost values, and multiply. Failed or cancelled generations are not charged, and a completed one is billed in full. Because you pay cost_usd × n, a four-image call costs four times the single-image line.
Budget checklist
To keep a batch inside a budget:
- Pass
qualityand an explicit size instead ofauto. - Multiply the
cost_usdline bynfor each call. - Sum
usage.costfrom every response and compare it with your estimate. - Do not compute spend from token counts; Sume always returns 0 there.
Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- GPT Image 2.5 cost per megapixel: $0.050, $0.019, $0.012
Per megapixel, fal GPT Image 2.5 high falls from $0.0502 at 1024x1024 to $0.0121 at 4K. Worked from the fal page, with a note on what Sume bills.
- GPT Image 2.5 high: 1920x1080 costs less than 1024x1024
On fal, GPT Image 2.5 Flare high is $0.0396 at 1920x1080 and $0.05268 at 1024x1024. Why the bigger frame is cheaper and how to plan around it.
- GPT Image 2.5 quality ladder: price multiplier from low to max on Sume
At 1024x1024 on Sume, GPT Image 2.5 high costs 8.9 times low, xhigh 15.9 times and max 35.7 times. The ladder with billed prices and batch costs.
- GPT Image 2.5 xhigh vs max at 1024x1024: $0.09366 vs $0.21072
At 1024x1024, Sume's docs put GPT Image 2.5 xhigh output at $0.09366 and max at $0.21072 before input tokens and Sume pricing. When max is worth 2.25x.
Written by Sume