4:3 slide image at 1024x768 on GPT Image 2.5: legal, and the price
1024x768 is a legal 4:3 box for GPT Image 2.5 (786,432 pixels). About $0.0113 at medium and $0.0451 at high on Sume.

1024x768 works on GPT Image 2.5: both edges are multiples of 16, it has 786,432 pixels (above the 655,360 floor), and 4:3 is well inside the 3:1 limit. On Sume it costs about $0.0113 at medium and $0.0451 at high, before input tokens.
Unlike 16:9, a 4:3 box is easy to hit: any width that is a multiple of 64 gives a height that is a multiple of 16.
Price by quality
Sume bills the provider list price times 1.25, as this worked-examples post shows.
| Quality | Output tokens | Provider list | Sume (list x 1.25) |
|---|---|---|---|
| low | 134 | $0.0040 | $0.0050 |
| medium | 301 | $0.0090 | $0.0113 |
| high | 1,204 | $0.0361 | $0.0451 |
| xhigh | 2,140 | $0.0642 | $0.0802 |
| max | 4,815 | $0.1444 | $0.1806 |
Older slide decks
4:3 is the classic slide shape, and it is still the default in some exports. If your deck is 16:9, use an exact 16:9 size instead. For 4:3 at larger sizes, 1536x1152 and 2048x1536 follow the same rule.
The tradeoff is that GPT Image 2.5 is not the cheapest 4:3 model; some Sume models list a 4:3 aspect ratio and bill a flat price per image, so compare with the aspect-ratio cost post.
Check it on your own account
Do not budget from a blog table alone. GET /v1/images/models lists every model with its descriptors, and GET /v1/images/models/{id}/endpoints shows the pricing line for one model. Then run one small request and read usage.cost on the response, which is the billed amount in USD; the token counts in usage are reported as 0 on this route.
Run the test at the quality and size you plan to ship, because both move the price. A single test at low quality costs under a cent for most sizes here, so it is a cheap way to confirm your assumptions before a batch.
Sync, async and failures
The /v1/images route waits up to 30 seconds for the image. If the job finishes in that window you get the result directly; otherwise you get a 202 and an async job to poll. Write your client to branch on the status code, since larger sizes and higher quality are the likely cases for a 202.
Requests are strict. A parameter the chosen model does not list returns 400 unsupported_parameter, stream returns a 400, and provider.only or provider.order accept only sume. Treat a 400 as a bug in the request, not a transient error, and do not retry it unchanged.
Caveat
The 'Sume' columns are list times 1.25 before any rounding on the job ledger and before input tokens, so read usage.cost on the response for the amount actually billed.
Sources
Related posts
More in Use cases
- 3:2 photo at 1536x1024 on GPT Image 2.5: $0.006 at low to $0.21 at max
1536x1024 is an exact legal 3:2 box for GPT Image 2.5. On Sume it costs about $0.0059 at low, $0.0515 at high and $0.2058 at max.
- Graduation announcement card art at 4:5, name and year added in code
Generate graduation card art on Sume at 4:5 with a clear middle, then add the graduate's name and year in code so the details are exact and easy to change.
- Halloween safety video with an AI avatar for parents and schools
A 21-second three-scene avatar video built from the FDA Halloween tips: costumes, candy and contact lenses. The request body, the cost by tier, and the label.
- Chain two AI clips: last frame in, then first_frame out
To continue a clip on Sume, extract its last frame with video_frames, then send it as first_frame on the next job. It fixes pose and position, not sound.
Written by Sume