Gladia Starter $0.61 per hour vs Sume STT $0.60 per hour
Gladia Starter prices async transcription at $0.61 an hour with 50 euros of free credit. Sume STT works out to $0.60 an hour. What differs besides the price.

Gladia's pricing page lists its Starter plan at $0.61 per hour for asynchronous transcription and $0.75 per hour for real-time, with 50 euros of free credits. Sume STT 1.0 is $0.01 per audio minute, which is $0.60 per hour. At list price the two are within a cent of each other, so the choice is about the shape of the product, not the rate.
Gladia also lists a Growth tier as low as $0.20 per hour async, so the Starter number is not its floor.
Side by side
All Gladia figures are from its own pricing page, read on 2026-10-02.
| Item | Gladia | Sume STT 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Async, entry tier | $0.61 per hour (Starter) | $0.60 per hour ($0.01 per minute) |
| Real-time | $0.75 per hour (Starter) | Not offered |
| Lower tier | As low as $0.20 per hour async (Growth) | Single public rate |
| Free credit | 50 euros on the page | See your balance; no free-credit claim here |
| Concurrency on entry tier | 30 real-time and 25 async | See Sume rate limits |
What you get from Sume
Sume STT takes a public HTTPS audio_url, an optional language_code, and a duration_seconds hint of 1 to 600. It returns text and word-level words[] with start and end times, and a sentence segmentation mode that returns caption-line shaped segments.
The same API key also runs captions, timeline audio and music, so a transcript can feed POST /v1/video-captions as words without another vendor.
import os, requests
r = requests.post(
"https://api.sume.com/v1/stt-1.0/transcribe",
headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {os.environ['SUME_API_KEY']}",
"Idempotency-Key": "stt-demo-001"},
json={"audio_url": "https://example.com/call.mp3",
"language_code": "en",
"duration_seconds": 300},
)
print(r.status_code, r.json())Where Gladia is the better fit
If you need real-time streaming transcription, Sume does not offer it today; Gladia lists it. If your volume qualifies for a lower tier, Gladia's published floor is well under Sume's single rate.
If your workload is batch files inside a media pipeline, Sume's parity price plus the shared job model is the reason to stay put.
Worked example
Compare a month of calls. The figures use Gladia's Starter async rate and Sume's per-minute rate, nothing else.
- 100 hours: Gladia Starter $61.00, Sume STT $60.00.
- 1,000 hours: Gladia $610.00, Sume $600.00.
- Gladia's Growth tier, listed as low as $0.20 per hour, would be $200.00 for 1,000 hours if you qualify.
Checklist before you commit
Because the entry-tier prices are this close, concurrency and the surrounding workflow decide it. Gladia's page lists 25 concurrent async jobs on Starter; Sume's limits are described in its docs and by your workspace.
- Ask whether you need real-time: only Gladia lists it.
- Test a call with two speakers on each service and check how the output names them.
- Confirm your language is covered; Gladia's page lists 100+ languages.
Sources
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- Google Chirp 3 Instant Custom Voice: 10 s consent, allowlist only
Google's Chirp 3 Instant Custom Voice is allowlisted, wants a 10-second consent clip, and keeps the cloning key on your side. How that compares to a Sume clone.
- Flow charges 7 to 15 credits for Omni Flash; Sume bills dollars
Google Flow prices Gemini Omni Flash 720p at 7 to 15 credits by length. Sume bills the same model per second in dollars; clip costs from 3 to 10 seconds.
- Flow video edit costs 40 credits a try; Sume bills per second
Flow charges 40 credits per Gemini Omni video edit. Sume's video_url edit bills output seconds: $0.625 for 5 seconds, $1.25 for 10 at 720p.
- gpt-4o-mini-tts instructions vs Sume TTS speed, volume, emotion
OpenAI steers gpt-4o-mini-tts with free-text instructions. Sume TTS exposes speed 0.6-1.5, volume 0.5-2 and a short emotion string. How the controls compare.
Written by Sume