Omni Flash 1.1 vs Wan 3.0 per second: which is cheaper at each tier?

At 720p Omni Flash 1.1 and Wan 3.0 both cost $0.125 a second on Sume. At 1080p Omni is $0.1875 against $0.25. Tier-by-tier table, list x 1.25.

4 min readSume
All posts

At 720p the two models cost the same on Sume, $0.1250 a second. Omni Flash is cheaper at 1080p ($0.1875 vs $0.2500) and has a 360p tier at $0.0375 that Wan lacks, while Wan is cheaper at 480p ($0.0625) where Omni has no tier. Omni also adds a 4K tier at $0.3750.

Table

From the Video Router docs and repo tables: Omni lists $0.03, $0.10, $0.15 and $0.30 per second at 360p, 720p, 1080p and 4K; Wan lists $0.05, $0.10 and $0.20 at 480p, 720p and 1080p. Sume bills list x 1.25.

Omni Flash 1.1 vs Wan 3.0 per second, read 2026-10-13
TierOmni Flash 1.1Wan 3.0Cheaper
360p$0.0375n/aOmni (only one)
480pn/a$0.0625Wan (only one)
720p$0.1250$0.1250tie
1080p$0.1875$0.2500Omni
4K$0.3750n/aOmni (only one)

What else differs

Omni Flash takes 3 to 10 seconds and also supports reference images, reference clips and edit mode; Wan 3.0 takes 2 to 30 seconds. A 12-second ad is therefore Wan only in one job. Omni accepts 16:9 and 9:16 only. For a 10-second 1080p shot the two cost $1.88 and $2.50.

Sources

Related posts

More in Comparisons

All Comparisons posts

Written by Sume