ElevenLabs Avatars Flows batch hooks vs Sume idempotent submits
ElevenLabs integrates Avatars with Flows to batch products, languages and hooks. How to batch avatar videos in Sume with idempotency keys.
To batch avatar videos across products, languages and hooks in Sume, loop over your matrix and submit one async POST /v1/avatar-1.0/talking-video per cell with a unique idempotency key. ElevenLabs advertises a Flows integration for the same kind of batch production inside its tool; Sume leaves the loop in your code or agent, which makes retries and limits explicit.
What ElevenLabs describes
The ElevenLabs page says Avatars integrates with Flows to produce batches across products, languages and hooks. That is a workflow inside the vendor's interface; the Avatars API is stated as planned.
The matrix in Sume
Give each cell its own key, for example product, language and hook joined into one string, so a repeat run does not create duplicates. Each request names the same avatar handle and a script for that cell.
Admission is plan based. Concurrency is Free 1, Pro 4, Startup 8, Scale 20 and Enterprise 20, with queue capacity of max(3, concurrency x 5). Accepted capacity is concurrency plus queue; beyond it you receive 429 queue_full. See generation admission.
| Plan | Concurrency | Queue capacity |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 1 | 5 |
| Pro | 4 | 20 |
| Startup | 8 | 40 |
| Scale | 20 | 100 |
| Enterprise | 20 | 100 |
Handle the edges
Treat 429 queue_full as a signal to wait, not to resubmit blindly, and treat 402 insufficient_credits as a stop. Use a webhook for terminal events rather than polling every job.
For agents, dry_run=true shows admission and cost first, which is useful before a large matrix goes out.
Sources
Related posts
More in Use cases
- EU AI icon: embedded in the video or a UI overlay, and when reshared
The Commission says the EU AI icon should be embedded in the content unless an equivalent like a UI overlay exists, and be visible on reshare or download.
- EU AI icon licence: free, no attribution, not proof of compliance
The Commission's EU AI icons are free with no attribution, but using one does not prove compliance, and a non-signatory using one does not signal adherence.
- EU AI transparency code timeline: first draft to final, June 2026
From a first draft on 17 December 2025 to the final code on 10 June 2026 and about 190 signatories by end July: the dates the Commission lists.
- GPAI Code of Practice vs the AI-content transparency code
The Commission FAQ says Article 50 complements GPAI rules: the GPAI code covers model documentation, the transparency code covers marking and labelling outputs.
Written by Sume