Eight 0.5K drafts, then one 4K final: Nano Banana 2.1 costs $0.80

Iterate a hero image eight times at 0.5K for $0.60, then render the keeper at 4K for $0.20: $0.80 total on Nano Banana 2.1 through Sume, versus $1.60.

5 min readSume
All posts

Iterating a hero image on Nano Banana 2.1 is cheaper when you draft small: eight 0.5K drafts at $0.075 cost $0.60, and one 4K final at $0.20 brings it to $0.80. Eight full 4K tries would cost 8 x $0.20 = $1.60.

Why the draft tier exists

The Sume catalog lists four resolution tiers for google/nano-banana-2.1: 0.5K (also written 512), 1K, 2K and 4K. Billing is per image at the tier you request, so the lower tier is a straight discount while you are still choosing a composition.

Hero-image iteration plans on google/nano-banana-2.1, Sume list as of 2026-10-08
PlanArithmeticCost
8 drafts at 0.5K plus 1 final at 4K8 x 0.075 + 0.20$0.80
8 drafts at 1K plus 1 final at 4K8 x 0.10 + 0.20$1.00
8 tries at 4K8 x 0.20$1.60
12 drafts at 0.5K plus 1 final at 4K12 x 0.075 + 0.20$1.10

Does the final match the draft?

Not exactly. A new generation at a different tier is a new image, not an upscale of the draft. To keep the draft's composition, send it as a reference to an edit call at the higher tier, with a prompt that says to keep the layout. That adds one more 4K call but still lands near $0.80 plus the edit.

A practical limit

Small drafts hide fine detail, so they are poor for judging text. If label text is the point, draft at 1K. Remember that 4K calls are the most likely to return a 202 job envelope, so build the final step to handle that.

Where the savings come from

The saving against the all-4K plan is $1.60 minus $0.80, or $0.80, which is 50%. For 100 hero images the draft plan is 100 x $0.80 = $80.00 and the all-4K plan is 100 x $1.60 = $160.00, so the gap is $80.00.

The saving shrinks if you need more drafts per final. With 20 drafts at 0.5K, the plan is 20 x $0.075 + $0.20 = $1.70, which is already above eight 4K tries at $1.60. Set a draft cap before you start, and stop drafting when the composition is settled.

Pick the final tier by use. A web hero rarely needs 4K, so 2K at $0.15 is a fair final for it: 8 x $0.075 + $0.15 = $0.75.

Practical settings

Use a fixed seed-like discipline by keeping the prompt text identical between draft and final, changing only the tier. Sume does not accept a seed field (the docs say a request that sends one returns 400 unsupported_parameter), so you cannot reproduce a draft exactly. That is why the final should be treated as a new image, or generated as an edit of the chosen draft.

Name each draft file with the prompt hash and the tier so that you can find the one that you picked.

Mixed plans work well too. A common one is eight drafts at 0.5K, a 2K pass on the two best at $0.15 each, and a 4K final on the winner: 8 x 0.075 + 2 x 0.15 + 0.20 = $1.10. It costs $0.30 more than the simple plan and gives you a mid-size look at two finalists before you commit to 4K. Choose it when two compositions are close and the 4K call is the one you want to get right.

Sources

Related posts

More in Pricing

All Pricing posts

Written by Sume