Dim or crop a clip: does YouTube need an altered-content label?

YouTube exempts color adjustment, beauty and effects filters. Whether a Sume video filter dim or crop falls under that, and what the exemption does not cover.

4 min readSume
All posts

A dim or crop is a pixel pass, and the YouTube disclosure page is explicit about minor edits: it lists "beauty filters," "color adjustment," "special effects filters," "caption creation," and cloning one's own voice for voice overs as not needing disclosure.

What Sume's filter does

Video filter has two ops. dim multiplies luma, so black stays black and chroma does not change. crop takes a rectangle as fractions of the frame. Both keep the geometry otherwise, and the result is a new MP4 while the source is unchanged.

read 2026-10-05
EditDisclosure per the page
Dim to 0.45 lumaReads as color adjustment: not listed as needing it
Crop to a tighter frameNot named; if it hides or changes what happened, disclose
Crop that removes a person from a real eventCould alter footage of a real event: disclose

The test that remains

The page's criteria are about meaning: does the edit make a real person appear to say or do something they did not, alter footage of a real event or place, or generate a realistic scene that did not occur? A dim does not do any of those. A crop can, if it changes what the footage shows.

Practice

Keep the original next to the edited file. If a crop changes the story, answer Yes to Altered content, and note why. Disclosing, per the page, does not limit audience or monetization eligibility.

Sources

Related posts

More in Use cases

All Use cases posts

Written by Sume