Article 50: creator duties vs provider duties, side by side

Article 50(4) puts deepfake and certain text disclosure on deployers, while 50(2) puts marking on providers. A two-column split for teams that publish AI video.

5 min readSume
All posts

Under Article 50(4), a deployer that publishes a deepfake must disclose that it is artificially generated or manipulated, with lighter disclosure for evidently artistic or creative works. AI-generated text on matters of public interest needs disclosure unless a human reviewed it editorially. Article 50(2) is the separate provider duty to mark outputs in machine-readable form. If you publish video, you will usually sit in the first column.

The split

This is a reading aid built from the article text on the linked page. For an actual decision on your content, read the article in full and the Commission's guidance.

Article 50 duties by role (read 2026-10-03)
QuestionProvider, Art. 50(2)Deployer, Art. 50(4)
Core dutyMark outputs machine-readably so they are detectable as artificially generatedDisclose deepfakes as artificially generated or manipulated
Quality barEffective, interoperable, robust and reliable, as far as technically feasibleDisclosure to the audience
Creative worksNot the focus of this paragraphLimited disclosure
TextMarking applies to synthetic outputsPublic-interest AI text needs disclosure unless human editorial review
ExceptionAssistive editing that does not substantially alter inputEditorial review exception for text

Where a generation API sits

A service like the Sume video API produces video from a prompt. You, the caller, decide what to publish and where. That puts the publication-side decisions on you: whether a clip is a deepfake, whether the creative-work wording applies, and how the disclosure appears.

What counts as a deepfake depends on the content. A realistic generated person who looks like a real one is a different case from a stylised mascot. Treat that call as a documented decision, not a default.

A deployer's working file

Keep one row per published clip. It takes five minutes per clip and gives you something to show if asked.

  • Show the disclosure at first exposure, not buried at the end.
  • Write it in plain words: "AI-generated" or "synthetic".
  • For text, record who reviewed it and when.
  • Revisit the file whenever the code of practice or guidance changes.
clip,job_id,realistic_person,creative_work,disclosure_text,placed_at,date
launch-9x16.mp4,<job id>,yes,no,AI-generated video,first frame caption,2026-10-03

What this post leaves out

It does not cover penalties, member-state enforcement or transitional rules. Those are in the regulation and the Commission's pages, and in other posts on this blog.

Making the call on creative work

The creative-works wording is the part teams most want to use and most often misread. It limits how the disclosure is shown; it does not remove it. A film-like piece can carry a short, unobtrusive notice rather than a banner over the picture.

A practical approach is to write two disclosure forms for each campaign: a plain one for ads and a lighter one for creative pieces. Choose per clip, and record the choice.

Revisit the choice if a clip moves to a new context. A scene that is clearly art on a gallery page may read as real news footage when cropped and shared elsewhere.

Sources

Related posts

More in Use cases

All Use cases posts

Written by Sume