How to compare AI video models fairly: one prompt, three models, 480p

Submit one prompt to Seedance 2.0 Mini, Wan 3.0 and MiniMax H3 at 480p and 5 seconds on Sume, then judge the clips blind. A runnable Python test harness.

5 min readSume
All posts

A fair model comparison on Sume holds everything fixed except the model: the same prompt, 480p, 5 seconds and the same aspect ratio. Seedance 2.0 Mini, Wan 3.0 and MiniMax H3 all accept that envelope, so one script can submit three jobs and give you three clips to review without knowing which is which.

Fix the variables

Choose values every candidate accepts: 5 seconds is inside all three models' ranges, 480p is a rung on all three, and 16:9 is accepted by all three. There is no seed on any of these models, so run each prompt a few times if the decision matters, and judge more than one take per model.

The harness

It submits one job per model with its own Idempotency-Key and prints the job ids. Poll each with the usual status endpoint afterwards.

import asyncio
import os

import httpx

MODELS = ["seedance-2-mini", "wan-3.0", "minimax-h3"]
PROMPT = "A barista pours oat milk into a latte, slow push-in, warm light"


async def submit(client: httpx.AsyncClient, model: str) -> tuple[str, str]:
    body = {"model": model, "prompt": PROMPT, "resolution": "480p",
            "duration": 5, "aspect_ratio": "16:9"}
    headers = {"Idempotency-Key": f"compare-001-{model}"}
    response = await client.post("/v1/videos", json=body, headers=headers)
    response.raise_for_status()
    return model, response.json()["id"]


async def main() -> None:
    key = os.environ["SUME_API_KEY"]
    headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {key}"}
    async with httpx.AsyncClient(base_url="https://api.sume.com", headers=headers) as client:
        for model, job_id in await asyncio.gather(*(submit(client, m) for m in MODELS)):
            print(model, job_id)


asyncio.run(main())

Judge it blind

Rename the downloaded files to A, B and C and have someone who did not run the job rank them on the things you care about: product fidelity, motion, text, audio. Then rerun the winner at the resolution you will ship. At the catalog's dated Wan list rate of $0.05 per second, a 5-second 480p test is $0.25 at list.

What the three jobs hold fixed, read 2026-10-03. Source: Sume video catalog on origin/main, read 2026-10-03.
SettingValueWhy
Resolution480plowest rung shared by all three
Duration5 sinside every range
Aspect ratio16:9accepted by all three
Idempotency-Keyone per modelretries reuse the job

Sources

Related posts

More in Developers

All Developers posts

Written by Sume