Does ChatGPT Images 2.5 add a watermark? C2PA explained

OpenAI says ChatGPT Images 2.5 uses C2PA metadata and invisible watermarking to identify its images. What that means for files you get through an API.

4 min readSume
All posts

OpenAI does not describe a visible watermark for ChatGPT Images 2.5. On its launch page it says it continues to use C2PA metadata and invisible watermarking to help identify images made with its tools.

Facts about OpenAI come from its launch page, read 2026-09-29. Facts about Sume come from the Image API docs. The two do not overlap on this topic, and the gap matters if you generate GPT Image 2.5 pictures through Sume.

What does OpenAI say about safeguards?

The page's safety section says ChatGPT Images 2.5 builds on OpenAI's existing safeguards, with checks on prompts and images to help prevent harmful outputs. It then names the two identification methods and points to a system card for the evaluations. It does not give the technical detail of either mark on that page.

From OpenAI's ChatGPT Images 2.5 page, read 2026-09-29.
MechanismWhat the page says
C2PA metadataUsed to help identify images made with OpenAI's tools
Invisible watermarkingUsed to help identify images made with OpenAI's tools
Visible watermarkNot mentioned on the page
Prompt and image checksUsed to help prevent harmful outputs

What is C2PA metadata?

The OpenAI page names C2PA metadata and invisible watermarking but gives no technical detail on either. Whether a mark survives a re-save, re-encode or screenshot is not stated there, so test it on your own files rather than assume. A C2PA reader run on a real output file shows whether provenance data is present; that check is yours to make, because neither OpenAI's page nor Sume's docs promise it for files you receive through an API.

Do the marks survive when I generate through Sume?

Sume's docs do not say. They describe the result as a Sume-hosted URL in data[].url rather than inline base64, and note that Sume already mirrors generated media. Nothing in the docs mentions C2PA, watermarking or metadata handling for images, so this post makes no claim either way. If you need the marks, inspect a real output file with a C2PA reader before relying on it.

Do I still have to disclose AI images?

A watermark and a disclosure are separate things. Platforms set their own rules. YouTube's help page, read 2026-09-29, says it requires creators to disclose when they use AI to meaningfully alter or generate photorealistic content. Check the platform's own page for each place you publish; YouTube AI content policy walks through that one.

Where does GPT Image 2.5 fit on Sume?

OpenAI's page separates the ChatGPT product from the API models GPT-Image-2.5 Flare and Sunburst. Sume lists them as openai/gpt-image-2.5 and openai/gpt-image-2.5-sunburst. See GPT Image 2.5 release date and model ids for the naming.

Sources

Related posts

More in Models

All Models posts

Written by Sume