New AI video models since June 2026: which run on Sume?
Ray3.2, Omni 1.1 Flash, Wan 3.0, MiniMax H3, Seedance 2.5 and Kling 4.0, each checked against Sume's video router catalog. Four run today; two do not.

Which of the new video models run on Sume? Seedance 2.5, Wan 3.0, MiniMax H3 and Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash do, each under its own id in the video router. Luma Ray3.2 and Kling 4.0 do not. The table below gives one fact from each vendor's own page and the Sume id, if any.
| Model | Vendor fact from its page | Sume id |
|---|---|---|
| Luma Ray3.2 | Released June 9, 2026; up to 20 s clips; API for the first time | None |
| Wan 3.0 | Native 30 s; up to 20 reference assets | wan-3.0 |
| MiniMax H3 | 4-15 s; 768P and 2K | minimax-h3, minimax-h3-max |
| Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash | 3-10 s clips, extension to 40 s | gemini-omni-flash-1.1 |
| Seedance 2.5 | Up to 30 s per generation | seedance-2.5 |
| Kling 4.0 | 3-30 s; early access since Sept 28 | None |
Reading the table
Vendor facts come from Luma's Ray3.2 post, the Wan 3.0 repository, the MiniMax guide, the Omni docs, the Seed announcement and the Kling 4.0 post. Sume ids come from the catalog in the video models docs.
Sume's own durations differ from some vendor pages. Wan 3.0 runs 2 to 30 seconds there, MiniMax H3 starts at 5, and Omni runs 3 to 10 per clip. Sume does not expose Omni's 40 second extension.
Why two are missing
Luma's post says its API is available for the first time with Ray3.2, but the page lists no pricing, and Sume has no Luma row. Kling 4.0 is in early access with no API details on the page. Sume does not list a model until it has a catalog row it can route and bill, so a launch announcement on its own changes nothing in the list.
Veo is separate: Sume's docs say Veo 3.1 is not in the catalog.
Check it yourself
The authoritative list is GET /v1/videos/models. One quirk: higgsfield-genjutsu appears there only when its provider is configured, so your account may list 11 ids where the docs table shows 12.
What to do with this
Treat the table as a snapshot dated 2026-10-06. If your plan depends on a model that is not on Sume, pick the nearest catalog row for the same job and test it. For long clips, Seedance 2.5 and Wan 3.0 are the two rows that reach 30 seconds. For short clips with native audio, Omni covers 3 to 10 seconds. For multi-reference work, the MiniMax rows take up to 9 images, 3 videos and 3 audio clips, with 12 files combined.
Whenever a vendor post says an API is coming, wait for a stable model id and a published price before you plan a launch around it.
Sources
- Introducing Ray3.2, Luma (read 2026-10-06)
- Build with Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash, Google (read 2026-10-06)
- Gemini API Omni docs (read 2026-10-06)
- Wan 3.0 repository, Alibaba Cloud (read 2026-10-06)
- MiniMax video generation guide (read 2026-10-06)
- Seedance 2.5 announcement, ByteDance Seed (read 2026-10-06)
- Kling 4.0 announcement (read 2026-10-06)
- Sume video models docs (read 2026-10-06)
Related posts
More in Comparisons
- Amazon Nova Canvas alternative: edit and generate images on Sume
Looking for a Nova Canvas alternative? Map its task types to Sume's /v1/images: what carries over, what does not, and what an edit costs per model.
- Titan Image Generator alternative: product photo edits on Sume
Replacing Titan Image Generator v2 for product photos? What its features map to on Sume's /v1/images, and what you lose: fine-tuning, palettes, masks.
- Bedrock background removal (Nova, Titan) vs Sume transparent output
Nova Canvas and Titan v2 remove backgrounds into transparent PNGs. On Sume, background transparent is a GPT Image 2.5 option. Compare what each returns.
- Bedrock image features Sume does not have: an honest gap list
Moving off Bedrock image models? These Nova Canvas and Titan features have no Sume equivalent: maskPrompt, mergeStyle, similarityStrength, fine-tuning.
Written by Sume