What 96 storyboard frames cost on Nano Banana 2.1 (Sume)
96 storyboard frames cost $9.60 on Sume with Nano Banana 2.1 at 1K and $19.20 at 4K. Tier table, retry margin, and a request that runs.

96 storyboard frames cost $9.60 on Sume with Nano Banana 2.1 at 1K (96 x $0.10). The 0.5K tier brings that to $7.20; 2K is $14.40 and 4K is $19.20. With a 20 percent retry allowance the 1K job is $11.52.
A film student storyboards a short and wants frames per scene plus a pitch clip. The open question is how many images to buy and at which size.
What does each tier cost?
Sume bills Nano Banana 2.1 per image by resolution tier. The table prices 96 images at each tier and, for comparison, the same count on Grok Image, which Sume lists at one flat per-image price. Both come from Sume's rate card as read on 2026-10-10; re-read the model catalog before a large run, since list prices can change.
| Option | Count x unit price | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Nano Banana 2.1 at 0.5K | 96 x $0.075 | $7.20 |
| Nano Banana 2.1 at 1K | 96 x $0.10 | $9.60 |
| Nano Banana 2.1 at 2K | 96 x $0.15 | $14.40 |
| Nano Banana 2.1 at 4K | 96 x $0.20 | $19.20 |
| Grok Image (default size) | 96 x $0.025 | $2.40 |
How many images should you budget for?
Plan for retries: rejected images are billed like any other. Adding 20 percent to 96 images means buying 115, which at 1K is $11.50. That is $0.11979 per kept image if you keep all 96. The 20 percent is an assumption, not a Sume figure; use your own rejection rate.
- Start at 1K ($0.10 per image) and move to 2K only for the images that need the extra detail.
- Use 0.5K ($0.075) for drafts you only need to approve.
- Aspect ratio does not change the Nano Banana 2.1 price in the rate card. If your slot is 16:9, confirm that ratio in
GET /v1/images/modelsbefore a large run.
What about the old Nano Banana 2 id?
Nano Banana 2 is retired on Sume. Requests that still send google/nano-banana-2 or nano-banana-2 run as Nano Banana 2.1, and the job stores the 2.1 id, so an old script is billed at the 2.1 rates above (Sume image docs, read 2026-10-10).
A request that runs
POST /v1/images takes model, prompt, n (1 to 10), resolution, and aspect_ratio. A request that finishes within 30 seconds answers 200 with image URLs; a slower one answers 202 with a job to poll at GET /v1/jobs/{id}/status. Branch on the status code.
import os
import requests
r = requests.post(
"https://api.sume.com/v1/images",
headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {os.environ['SUME_API_KEY']}"},
json={
"model": "google/nano-banana-2.1",
"prompt": "storyboard frames, one consistent style",
"n": 4,
"resolution": "1K",
"aspect_ratio": "16:9",
},
timeout=60,
)
print(r.status_code)
body = r.json()
if r.status_code == 200:
for item in body["data"]:
print(item["url"])
else:
print(body)Where to go next
See every AI model on Sume for the catalog, how Sume pricing works for the billing rules, and the API quickstart for keys and authentication.
Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- 60-second ad from 3 21-second clips: Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.5
3 clips of 21 seconds cover a 60-second ad. At 720p that is $7.875 on Wan 3.0 or $36.4014 on Seedance 2.5, before any trim or stitching jobs.
- 60-second ad from 3 22-second clips: Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.5
3 clips of 22 seconds cover a 60-second ad. At 720p that is $8.25 on Wan 3.0 or $38.1348 on Seedance 2.5, before any trim or stitching jobs.
- 60-second ad from 3 23-second clips: Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.5
3 clips of 23 seconds cover a 60-second ad. At 720p that is $8.625 on Wan 3.0 or $39.8682 on Seedance 2.5, before any trim or stitching jobs.
- 60-second ad from 3 24-second clips: Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.5
3 clips of 24 seconds cover a 60-second ad. At 720p that is $9.00 on Wan 3.0 or $41.6016 on Seedance 2.5, before any trim or stitching jobs.
Written by Sume