20 ultrawide 21:9 website heroes on Sume: from $0.50 to $3.75
Eight Sume image rows list 21:9. Twenty heroes cost $0.50 on Qwen Image, $0.75 on FLUX.2 Pro, $2.00 on Nano Banana 2.1 at 1K, or $3.75 on Nano Banana Pro.

The short answer
Twenty 21:9 website hero images cost $0.50 on qwen-image, $0.75 on flux-2-pro, $1.00 on recraft-v4, $1.25 on flux-2-flex, $2.00 on nano-banana-2.1 at 1K, or $3.75 on nano-banana-pro at 1K or 2K. Along with qwen-image-max at $1.88, these are the eight Sume rows whose aspect list includes 21:9, per the repo's image catalog. GPT Image 2.5, Seedream, Imagen and Ideogram do not list it.
The eight rows
The aspect lists come from Sume's image catalog in the repo, and the prices from the lead-verified list as of 2026-10-09. Nano Banana 2.1 appears twice because its price depends on the tier.
| Model | Price per image | 20 images | Arithmetic |
|---|---|---|---|
| qwen-image | $0.025 | $0.50 | 20 x 0.025 |
| flux-2-pro | $0.0375 | $0.75 | 20 x 0.0375 |
| recraft-v4 | $0.05 | $1.00 | 20 x 0.05 |
| flux-2-flex | $0.0625 | $1.25 | 20 x 0.0625 |
| qwen-image-max | $0.09375 | $1.88 | 20 x 0.09375 = 1.875 |
| nano-banana-2.1 (1K) | $0.10 | $2.00 | 20 x 0.10 |
| nano-banana-2.1 (2K) | $0.15 | $3.00 | 20 x 0.15 |
| nano-banana-pro (1K or 2K) | $0.1875 | $3.75 | 20 x 0.1875 |
Why ratio, not pixels
A 21:9 hero is a 2.33:1 strip. Ask for it with aspect_ratio: "21:9" on a model that lists it. Sending the ratio to a model that does not list it returns 400 unsupported_parameter; Sume does not drop the field. sume/auto follows the GPT family, so a 21:9 request to Auto is rejected too. Name a model that lists the ratio.
If the page needs a specific pixel width such as 2560, generate at the highest tier you can afford and resize in your own code. Nano Banana 2.1 at 2K is the most common starting point here; its repo list also covers 4:1 and 8:1 if a thinner strip is needed later.
Picking a model
Start from the content. If the hero has text in it, test the models with the best text results first. If it is an abstract background, the cheapest row will probably do.
Crop safety matters for heroes. Keep the subject in the middle third, as ultrawide layouts often crop the sides on narrow screens.
A practical order
Start with the 2.5-cent qwen-image row to settle the layout, since 20 drafts are 50 cents. Move the three or four layouts you like to Nano Banana 2.1 at 2K. Add any text in the page itself, not in the image, so the headline stays editable and sharp at every width.
Arithmetic for the heroes: 20 x 0.025 = $0.50 for the lowest row and 20 x 0.1875 = $3.75 for the highest. The spread is 7.5 times, but both bills are small, so quality should drive the choice and the price should only break ties.
Export each hero in the exact pixel size your page uses. A 21:9 image on a 1440-wide layout is 1440 x 617 at its native display size, so a 2K render gives plenty of room for retina screens.
Finally, test the hero in the actual page layout before choosing. Place the image at its real width, then check it at phone width, where a 21:9 crop may cut the sides sharply.
Sources
Related posts
More in Use cases
- 24 Wan 3.0 boards at 480p, then 6 finals on Seedance 2 at 1080p
Twenty-four 6-second Wan 3.0 boards at 480p cost $9.00; finishing six shots on Seedance 2 at 1080p adds $30.618. Mixed-model cost versus Seedance-only drafts.
- 24x36 poster from Nano Banana 2.1 at 4K: 3392x5056, about 140 dpi
Google's size table gives Nano Banana 2.1 at 4K and 2:3 as 3392x5056. On a 24x36 inch print that is about 140 dpi. Sume bills the 4K image at $0.20.
- 28-second vertical ad from four 7 s Omni clips: $5.35 with the render
Four 7-second Gemini Omni Flash 1.1 clips at 1080p cost $5.25 on Sume; a Timeline render of the 28-second cut adds $0.10, so the ad is $5.35 in total.
- 3-second product hook: Seedance 2.5 bills 4 s, Wan 3.0 bills 3 s
Seedance 2.5 on Sume starts at 4 seconds, so a 3-second hook at 720p bills 4 x $0.5778 = $2.31. Wan 3.0 accepts 2 seconds: 3 x $0.125 = $0.375.
Written by Sume