120 sock colorway images: Nano Banana 2.1 cost on Sume
120 sock colorway images cost $12.00 on Sume with Nano Banana 2.1 at 1K and $24.00 at 4K. Tier table, retry margin, and a request that runs.

120 sock colorway images cost $12.00 on Sume with Nano Banana 2.1 at 1K (120 x $0.10). The 0.5K tier brings that to $9.00; 2K is $18.00 and 4K is $24.00. With a 20 percent retry allowance the 1K job is $14.40.
An online sock shop has 40 designs in three colorways and needs a consistent image set for each. The open question is how many images to buy and at which size.
What does each tier cost?
Sume bills Nano Banana 2.1 per image by resolution tier. The table prices 120 images at each tier and, for comparison, the same count on Qwen Image, which Sume lists at one flat per-image price. Both come from Sume's rate card as read on 2026-10-10; re-read the model catalog before a large run, since list prices can change.
| Option | Count x unit price | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Nano Banana 2.1 at 0.5K | 120 x $0.075 | $9.00 |
| Nano Banana 2.1 at 1K | 120 x $0.10 | $12.00 |
| Nano Banana 2.1 at 2K | 120 x $0.15 | $18.00 |
| Nano Banana 2.1 at 4K | 120 x $0.20 | $24.00 |
| Qwen Image (default size) | 120 x $0.025 | $3.00 |
How many images should you budget for?
Plan for retries: rejected images are billed like any other. Adding 20 percent to 120 images means buying 144, which at 1K is $14.40. That is $0.12 per kept image if you keep all 120. The 20 percent is an assumption, not a Sume figure; use your own rejection rate.
- Start at 1K ($0.10 per image) and move to 2K only for the images that need the extra detail.
- Use 0.5K ($0.075) for drafts you only need to approve.
- Aspect ratio does not change the Nano Banana 2.1 price in the rate card. If your slot is 1:1, confirm that ratio in
GET /v1/images/modelsbefore a large run.
What about the old Nano Banana 2 id?
Nano Banana 2 is retired on Sume. Requests that still send google/nano-banana-2 or nano-banana-2 run as Nano Banana 2.1, and the job stores the 2.1 id, so an old script is billed at the 2.1 rates above (Sume image docs, read 2026-10-10).
A request that runs
POST /v1/images takes model, prompt, n (1 to 10), resolution, and aspect_ratio. A request that finishes within 30 seconds answers 200 with image URLs; a slower one answers 202 with a job to poll at GET /v1/jobs/{id}/status. Branch on the status code.
import os
import requests
r = requests.post(
"https://api.sume.com/v1/images",
headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {os.environ['SUME_API_KEY']}"},
json={
"model": "google/nano-banana-2.1",
"prompt": "sock colorway images, one consistent style",
"n": 4,
"resolution": "1K",
"aspect_ratio": "1:1",
},
timeout=60,
)
print(r.status_code)
body = r.json()
if r.status_code == 200:
for item in body["data"]:
print(item["url"])
else:
print(body)Where to go next
See every AI model on Sume for the catalog, how Sume pricing works for the billing rules, and the API quickstart for keys and authentication.
Sources
Related posts
More in Pricing
- 13 review intro clips at 5s each: Wan 3.0 cost on Sume
13 review intro clips of 5 s (65 s total) cost $4.06 at Wan 3.0 480p, $8.13 at 720p and $16.25 at 1080p on Sume.
- One 13-second AI video clip: Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.5 on Sume
A 13-second clip in one request: $1.625 on Wan 3.0 or $7.5114 on Seedance 2.5 at 720p, with 480p and 1080p prices for both models in the table.
- 130 packet illustrations: Nano Banana 2.1 cost on Sume
130 packet illustrations cost $13.00 on Sume with Nano Banana 2.1 at 1K and $26.00 at 4K. Tier table, retry margin, and a request that runs.
- 130 video thumbnails with Nano Banana 2.1: cost by tier
130 video thumbnails cost $13.00 on Sume with Nano Banana 2.1 at 1K and $26.00 at 4K. Tier table, retry margin, and a request that runs.
Written by Sume